W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > May 2004

Re: e-notation definition missing from MathML 2nd ed schemas?

From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 00:39:24 -0400
Message-ID: <40A2FBFC.6010403@stratumtek.com>
To: mhucka@caltech.edu
Cc: www-math@w3.org

The e-notation is just (or is supposed to be) an allowed value
for the "type" attribute.  Basically, there are several types of
numbers, all having 2 parts, and all represented as

    <cn type="xxx">part1<sep/>part2</cn>

Depending on the type, the parts represent different things.  In the case
of type e-notation,  it is mantissa and exponent.    In the case of
a rational number it is numerator and denominator.

There is an errata candidate lurking here in that we do state:


          4.4.1.1.2 Attributes

All attributes are *CDATA*:

type

    Allowed values are "real", "integer", "rational",
    "complex-cartesian", "complex-polar", "constant"

...
which should also list "e-notation" in addition to the other possible 
values in order to be consistent
with  the detailed discription of type found in  4.3.2.9 and in C.2.1.1 
MMLdefinition: |cn|


        4.3.2.9 |type|

cn

    indicates type of the number. Predefined values: "e-notation",
    "integer", "rational", "real", "complex-polar", "complex-cartesian",
    "constant".


Stan Devitt

Michael Hucka wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Regarding the particular bit of Schema you sent: e-notation
>is unusual in that it allows a <sep/> tag in the content, to
>delineate the two parts of the number.  It looks like the
>snippet of XML Schema you sent only has the part for adding
>e-notation to the enumeration for the 'type' attribute.  Is
>the <sep/> tag already handled by some other part of the
>MathML Schema, or does it need to be added somewhere too?
>
>MH
>
>  
>
Received on Thursday, 13 May 2004 00:39:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:56 GMT