- From: John Halleck <John.Halleck@utah.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:23:03 -0600 (MDT)
- To: Robert Miner <RobertM@dessci.com>
- Cc: John.Halleck@utah.edu, www-math@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Robert Miner wrote: > Hi. Howdy. > You wrote: > > > At > > http://www.w3.org/TR/mathml-units/ > > > > section: "5.3.3" > > > > "In this case, the context is necessary as the standard U.S. mile is > > equal to the international mile." > > > > This is a typo... this should read "... standard U.S. mile is NOT equal > > to the international mile." > > > > [snip] > > Thanks very much for your detailed and knowledgeable comments. You are welcome. All of the items I mentioned are items regularly beaten to death on Surveyor's Forums... There are people MUCH more knowledgable than I on the topics, I just listen and learn. (: And note the anomolies like the Nambibian meter, and the Swedish mile :) > I'm not sure what the options are for making revisions in a W3C Note. > I will look into it. Thank you. > There is a newly formed Math Interest Group, and expanding on the use > of MathML for units sounds like a good agenda item. Stay tuned to > this list for developments! Sorry to say, I really don't follow the list... But for agenda topics, I wouldn't mind seeing better support for Modal logics. (And for the various 'variant' notations that the field abounds with.) > --Robert -- John.Halleck@utah.edu http://www.cc.utah.edu/~nahaj/ -- 801.585.9572
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 10:29:35 UTC