- From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:09:17 -0400
- To: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
- Cc: W3C MathML Development Discussion <www-math@w3.org>
Also Note:
It is generally more well defined and useful if the the table lists the
actual tex tokens.
There is nothing that says that you have to use the
unicode.xml by just concatenating the CDATA content
of the latex elements, and you should not expect that doing
so should work any better than doing so in TeX.
(e.g. trying to concatentate the strings "\textdollar" and "x" to
get the visual effect "$x".)
The job of the table is really to provide information at the
token level which can then be combined properly in other
contexts.
Stan Devitt
StratumTek.
William F Hammond wrote:
>"Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@xmlhack.ru> writes:
>
>
>
>> Correct example:
>>
>>| <character id="U00024" dec="36" mode="mixed" type="normal">
>>| <afii>00A4</afii>
>>| <latex>\textdollar </latex>
>>| ...
>>| </character>
>>
>>
>
>Basically, yes, but in some contexts I think that '\textdollar ' is
>not quite safe. '\textdollar{}' is, I believe, always correct.
>
> -- Bill
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 9 April 2004 16:08:53 UTC