From: David Allouche <david@allouche.net>

Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:50:12 +0100

To: www-math@w3.org

Message-ID: <20031029205012.GD15204@ws24047.math.univ-rennes1.fr>

Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:50:12 +0100

To: www-math@w3.org

Message-ID: <20031029205012.GD15204@ws24047.math.univ-rennes1.fr>

Still working on my conversion tables... I noticed: -- ▪ is U+25AA. -- The comment for &squf (which is also U+25AA) contains "/blacksquare" (which I suppose means it is equivalent to LaTeX \blacksquare). -- The TeX font glyph TeXmacs use for its symbol <blacksquare> is translated by Omega to U+25AA. However: -- ▪ is U+25AA. -- The TeX font glyph for \blacksquare is clearly a _black (big) square_ and looks like it should be U+25A0. -- The TeX glyph which reads as a white square of the same size is mapped by Omega to U+25A1 and not U+25AB. This is not consistent. -- Looking at the Unicode chart, I can see that U+25AA is indeed a very small centered black square, while U+25A0 is a big black square. -- The MathML DTD has no entity for U+25A0. Everyone here seems to be wrong. The various entities for AA; should instead be A0. Is this just a mistake in MathML which has found its way into Omega, or is there a deep rationale behind it? -- -- ddaaReceived on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 15:50:47 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:34 UTC
*