At 11:33 2002-07-16 +0900, Masayasu Ishikawa wrote: >"Sean M. Burke" <sburke@cpan.org> wrote: > > >It's the Unicode name for U+03D6. Describing each character's usage > > >inside comment is probably out of scope for an XHTML specification. > > > > Yes, but the Unicode names are usually useful. Here it's actually > > misleading, so it really does require further elaboration -- notions of > > "scope" aside. > >And I don't think comment inside an XHTML specification is the right >place to do so. 1) It wouldn't hurt. 2) What do you suggest instead/besides? -- Sean M. Burke http://www.spinn.net/~sburke/Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 23:19:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:51 GMT