From: Tim Bagot <tsb-w3-math-0002@earth.li>

Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:56:41 +0000 (UTC)

To: <www-math@w3.org>

Cc: "Kamlesh Pandey, Noida" <kamleshp@noida.hcltech.com>

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204251803230.1081-100000@213-152-38-96.dsl.eclipse.net.uk>

Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:56:41 +0000 (UTC)

To: <www-math@w3.org>

Cc: "Kamlesh Pandey, Noida" <kamleshp@noida.hcltech.com>

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204251803230.1081-100000@213-152-38-96.dsl.eclipse.net.uk>

At 2002-04-24T13:33-0400, Kamlesh Pandey, Noida wrote:- > How do I represent in MathML two different concepts namely > assignment of one variable to other and > checking equality of one variable to other. I'll assume you're talking about content markup here. If you're talking about presentation markup, then it's up to you to choose different symbols for them according to the convention of your choice. > For example > x=y (meaning x is equal to y, which would assign value of y to x upon > evaluation) > > Vs. > > x=y ( Is x = y, which would return true or false) This one's easy:- <apply><eq/><ci>x</ci><ci>y</ci></apply> Assignment is harder, and doesn't properly exist in MathML AFAIAA. It's not clear to me that there's really a place for it until MathML is extended to be able to represent algorithms. <declare><ci>x</ci><ci>y</ci></declare> is probably closest, but would not normally be rendered. It is intended to modify the semantics of what follows, not to stand on its own. Assignment can mostly be translated into equality, with a little logical glue. Mathematically (as opposed to computationally) the line between the two is at best rather blurred; the distinction is really little more than a notational convenience. I do find it somewhat puzzling that the same element should be used for both mere declarations and definitions, but not rendered. Giving an identifier a value is probably significant for what follows, so omitting the fact when presenting the content to a human seems likely to cause confusion. Where a document contains multiple math elements the human reader might have the definition from an earlier expression, but in that case duplicating the definition for the declare element is probably not the best way of going about things. Tim BagotReceived on Thursday, 25 April 2002 14:57:45 GMT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50
: Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:51 GMT
*