W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > April 2002

Re: MathML- Content markup, Modules, eXtensibility, and more thoughts.

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:36:54 +0100
Message-Id: <200204170736.IAA32644@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: jimbofc@yahoo.com
CC: www-math@w3.org

> One thing I don't like about MathML-Content (MMLC) is that there are a great
> many of built-in operators and constants. 

There are advantages and disadvantages in having built in names.
If you prefer a style without then openmath is your friend:
(www.openmath.org) Your "modules" idea corresponds closely to openmath
content dictionaries.

(Many of us work on both openmath and mathml, the two languages are
rather well connected these days)

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 03:40:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:51 GMT