From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Date: 12 Apr 2002 09:13:34 -0500

To: Andrea Asperti <asperti@CS.UniBO.IT>

Cc: www-math@w3.org, www-rdf-logic@w3.org, Harold Boley <boley@informatik.uni-kl.de>, Claudio Sacerdoti_Coen <sacerdot@CS.UniBO.IT>

Message-Id: <1018620816.30353.4871.camel@dirk>

Date: 12 Apr 2002 09:13:34 -0500

To: Andrea Asperti <asperti@CS.UniBO.IT>

Cc: www-math@w3.org, www-rdf-logic@w3.org, Harold Boley <boley@informatik.uni-kl.de>, Claudio Sacerdoti_Coen <sacerdot@CS.UniBO.IT>

Message-Id: <1018620816.30353.4871.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 03:32, Andrea Asperti wrote: > > MathML supports implication, really? I couldn't find it when I looked a while ago. Aha! there it is: Example <apply> <implies/> <ci> A </ci> <ci> B </ci> </apply> -- http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter4.html#contm_implies > Do you have a clear idea of what you need? Umm... pretty much just first order logic. > For instance, what > kind of datatypes would you like to consider? Would you like > to work in a typed or an untyped formal setting? I'm not sure. I think a sorted/typed notation is handy. The RELAX-NG notation seems to be typed, for example. > etc. etc. > > In any case, a strong coordination with the MathML WG is surely > auspicable. Maybe we can try to create a small task force of people > interested in this issue. But the first problem is surely to > have a beeter understanding of what you (we) are looking for. I'll have to think about it... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 10:14:37 GMT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50
: Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:51 GMT
*