From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>

Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:50:09 -0500

Message-ID: <001d01c099c2$78f3c280$6961a8c0@devitt.local>

To: "Panyam, Sriram" <Sriram.Panyam@team.telstra.com>, <www-math@w3.org>

Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:50:09 -0500

Message-ID: <001d01c099c2$78f3c280$6961a8c0@devitt.local>

To: "Panyam, Sriram" <Sriram.Panyam@team.telstra.com>, <www-math@w3.org>

When converting from presentation markup to content markup you are facing three main issues. 1. To determine the correct content markup, you must make some assumptions about the conventions used by the person/machine who created the presentation markup. e.g. does D^2y represent apolynomial of total degree 3, or an application of a differential operator to the function y. If the presentation is machine generated from a single source according to strict conventions you can make good progress. If not, you will have difficulty getting it right, simply because the necessary information is missing and different authors use the same notational conventions to mean two different things. (It is a one to many transformation) 2. Pure content markup does not preserve the nuances of presentation. For example, it provides no mechanism to control how a particular construct is displayed. You may want derivatives of functions displayed with dots over the function name instead of with an operator, but pure content markup does not have that information available to it. (It is a many to one transformation) Once you have chosen a content markup, MathML does provide mechanisms to group both a presentation a content expression as a pair, and to help coordinate changes between the two. See chapter 5 for a discussion of the issues. 3. The defined content tag sets do not cover all existing mathematical concepts. (See appendix C) You may need to use MathML Content extension mechanisms (based on csymbol and uses of apply) to add the definitions you need to cover a particular topic. (mathematics is a growing discipline) Do you have a particular application in mind? Solutions in particular instances may be fairly simple. Stan Devitt Stratum Technical Services Ltd. jsdevitt@stratumtek.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Panyam, Sriram" <Sriram.Panyam@team.telstra.com> To: <www-math@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:23 PM Subject: Hi > HI > > Is it possible to convert every presentation markup document into an > equivalent content markup document? > > Sri > > >Received on Sunday, 18 February 2001 10:51:11 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:31 UTC
*