From: Nico Poppelier <nico@schier7.demon.nl>

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:25:15 +0100

Message-ID: <383AEA1B.424BEB9B@schier7.demon.nl>

To: GignacDA@nswccd.navy.mil

CC: rminer@geomtech.com, www-math@w3.org, WestbrookEL@nswccd.navy.mil, LeBeauRP@nswccd.navy.mil, GarnerFJ@nswccd.navy.mil

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:25:15 +0100

Message-ID: <383AEA1B.424BEB9B@schier7.demon.nl>

To: GignacDA@nswccd.navy.mil

CC: rminer@geomtech.com, www-math@w3.org, WestbrookEL@nswccd.navy.mil, LeBeauRP@nswccd.navy.mil, GarnerFJ@nswccd.navy.mil

Thank you for your comments. The Math working group is in the process of revising the MathML specification. A first working draft will be made available soon. I will answer your questions below. > 1. In the first paragraph of section 4.2.1.2 "Constructing General > Expressions", the example > <plus type="vector"/> > is incorrect. The working group will investigate this and will make an appropriate change in one of the working drafts. > 2. In the second paragraph of section 5.2 "How to Mix Markup", the example > <mrow> <plus/> <mi> x </mi> <mi> y </mi> </mrow> > is incorrect. Your observation is entirely correct. The revised text makes it very clear I think that this is an erroneous combination of presentation and content markup. > 3. In section 5.3 "Anticipating Macros for Combined Markup", the example > following "from 5.1.3 could then be condensed to" is incorrect. These errors have been fixed. > 4. Table 7.1.5.1 "MathML Elements Which Cannot Be Linking Elements" contains > "<prescripts/>". The MathML DTD does not define "prescripts". Is > "<mprescripts>" intended here? This has been fixed too. Once again: thank you for your comments. Regards, Nico Poppelier Math WG, editorReceived on Tuesday, 23 November 1999 14:25:02 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:29 UTC
*