From: Walter T. Stephens <ceramist@worldnet.att.net>

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 00:27:46 -0400

Message-ID: <006501bed331$63549b60$324b4c0c@thecomputer>

To: "Eisele, Fred" <fred.eisele@eds.com>, <www-math@w3.org>

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 00:27:46 -0400

Message-ID: <006501bed331$63549b60$324b4c0c@thecomputer>

To: "Eisele, Fred" <fred.eisele@eds.com>, <www-math@w3.org>

I advocate the first example because it only quantifies the mathematics without trying to further describe the mathematical expression. For example, I often calculate the Reynolds number for flowing gas streams. The formula for the Reynolds number depends upon properties of the flowing stream, which have definite quantities, but the Reynolds number itself is dimensionless. Understanding this fact allows the user to relate the result of the mathematical calculation with a physical behavior of the flowing stream. If some properties of the flowing stream were expressed in different units, one term using "inches" and another using "meters", then the Reynolds number loses its physical meaning but the mathematical formula is still correct. Only the user knows that the quantity calculated is the "Reynolds Number". Any content evaluating engine is simply using mathematical operators on some numerical values. Units thus allow the user to obtain some additional value while reducing the abstraction of the mathematical expression. By using namespace tags such as /position or /orientation, one requires the MATHML expression to take upon a definite meaning. For example, one might define a tag called /force and apply it to a vector F indicating the application of a force onto another object. This is an issue of qualification: how does an expression in MATHML render its definition beyond its mathematical content? In other words, how does someone completely express "Let X represent the position of an object in N dimensional space."? MATHML can descibe X using a vector, but what determines that it is also a position? What we have is a discussion about two seperate but valid concerns. Quantifying the expression and its terms establishes a physical relation to a known frame of reference. Qualifying an expression and its terms gives a further description to the user and possibly the content evaluating engine. I think both quantifying and qualifying the expression can be achieved by including attribute values on the value or identifier tags. "Let X be the position in meters of a particle in one dimension space" would be <ci unit="meters", definition="position">X</ci> The content evaluating engine can then make use of each attribute as needed and the user only need use the identifier X as desired. Any MATHML expression that uses X also embeds the definition of X instead of requiring additional tags. Replys are always welcome, Walter T. Stephens, Ph.D. Ceramic EngineerReceived on Wednesday, 21 July 1999 00:26:05 GMT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50
: Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:48 GMT
*