From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 14:03:04 +0100 (BST)

Message-Id: <199810051303.OAA13648@nag.co.uk>

To: www-math@w3.org

Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 14:03:04 +0100 (BST)

Message-Id: <199810051303.OAA13648@nag.co.uk>

To: www-math@w3.org

REC-MathML/chap6/ISOAMSRe1.html has: Cup 2323 up curve MMALIAS smile But Cup is already defined in REC-MathML/chap6/ISOAMSBe1.html Cup 22D3 double union ISOAMSB As the second definition is the pre-existing ISO one, I guess the alias for smile should be deleted? Similarly Subset is multiply declared. REC-MathML/chap6/ISOAMSRe1.html Subset 22D0 double subset MMALIAS Sub REC-MathML/chap6/ISOTECHe1.html Subset 2282 subset or is implied by MMALIAS sub In this case they are both MathML aliases, so which one wins? These were found by Sebastian Rahtz who was using my MathML entity declaration files, but as these files were auto generated from the text of the mathml recommendation, I'm passing this along:-) DavidReceived on Monday, 5 October 1998 09:03:53 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:28 UTC
*