W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > March 1998

RE: log vs root

From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@maplesoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:56:57 -0500
Message-ID: <DFBA4AED6924D111959A0060975EA7B4342F00@romulus.maplesoft.on.ca>
To: "'roconnor@uwaterloo.ca'" <roconnor@uwaterloo.ca>, www-math@w3.org
One design objective was to keep the introduction of new
elements to a minimum. Initially, one "repetition counter" type of
element was used in all such settings - partial derivatives, log bases,
roots.

The notion "degree of a log" seemed to stretch the common
use of "degree" too far, so "logbase" was introduced.
The distinction between degree and degree occuring inside
a root element seemed unnecessary.


Stan Devitt
Waterloo Maple Inc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
> [SMTP:roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca]
> Sent:	Friday, March 13, 1998 10:29 PM
> To:	www-math@w3.org
> Subject:	log vs root
> 
> Why does log have a logbase element, but root doesn't have a rootdgree
> element?  This seems like an inconsistancy. 
> 
> -- 
> Russell O'Connor                           roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
>     <URL:http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eroconnor/>
> "And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message"
> -- Anindita Dutta, "The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy"
Received on Monday, 16 March 1998 09:00:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:47 GMT