Re: [Request] Blackhole, HTFWriter, etc.

• To: frystyk@w3.org
• Subject: Re: [Request] Blackhole, HTFWriter, etc.
• From: Sacha <sacha@clip.dia.fi.upm.es>
• Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 12:19:19 +0200
• Cc: www-lib@w3.org
• From sacha@clip.dia.fi.upm.es Thu May 16 06: 20:04 1996
• In-Reply-To: <199605151620.MAA01257@www20.w3.org> (message from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on Wed, 15 May 1996 12:20:54 -0400)
• Message-Id: <9605161019.AA01401@sol.dia.fi.upm.es>

> Sacha writes:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Can the different stream types in HTFWrite.c be split into
> > separate files at some point, please? Unless of course there
> > is a good (non-historical) reason for their being all bundled
> > into one file...
> > 
> > Not a criticism, just a request.
>
> In the next version, the black hole stream and the error stream is part of 
> the HTStream module and so the HTFWrite module only contains file writer 
> streams. Is that what you had in mind?


Why not have HTBlackHole.c/h and HTErrorStream.c/h ? I just thought that if
you ever write more utility streams and keep putting them in one file it would
get confusing.

Maybe I'm just too used C++ where I tend to keep all the different classes in
different files... *sigh* you know what they say about old dogs and new
tricks (though I'm not an old dog and I suspect that putting everything in
one file is not exactly a new trick!)


Cheers,

Sacha.

• Re: [Request] Blackhole, HTFWriter, etc.
• From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>

• Prev: Saving to a file
• Next: Re: multiple requests
• Index: Message index of www-lib@w3.org mailing list
• Thread: Thread index of www-lib@w3.org mailing list