Re: re : More about structured streams, SGML/HTML parser...
>Which just canonizes the SGML stream on output, then we have our own
>processing of Data. e.g this canonizer would add the omitted tags.
>I do not agree that
>should be rendered differently, because the content is exactly the same,...
Indeed! But some browsers just do it. :-(
>in fact the parsing or canonizing process should be tolerant enough to let
>faulty stream pass in some situations. Warnings should be generated to allow
>browser to take decision.
>We are also considering using SGMLS, NSGMLS, SP (...) to canonize on-the-fly.
Do you have some experience or are you still just considering?
Dipl.-Inform. Rainer Klute NADS - Advertising on nets
Emil-Figge-Str. 80 Tel.: +49 231 9742570
D-44227 Dortmund Fax: +49 231 9742573