Re: libwww security advisory

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

> Vic Bancroft writes:
>
>> Okay, your patch looks like,
>
> [ . . . ]

Oh, sorry for not being more clear.  The patch I posted was pretty much 
the result of

    [bancroft@hilbert libwww]$ wget
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=118820
    [bancroft@hilbert libwww]$ mv attachment.cgi\?id\=118820 HTBound.c
    [bancroft@hilbert libwww]$ diff $( find . -name HTBound.c ) | tee
    HTBound.c.diff

My intent was to check in the results of

    [bancroft@hilbert libwww]$ patch Library/src/HTBound.c < HTBound.c.diff
    patching file Library/src/HTBound.c

Is there some modification to HTMIME.c that is needed for a complete 
revision ?

It would also help to have some nice examples of these problematic HTTP 
1.1 byte range requests for testing . . .

more,
l8r,
v

-- 
"The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."
 -- William Gibson, quoted by Whitfield Diffie