> libwww is a unique library. But it hasn't been maintained by anybody > for two years, and that's starting to show. I devoted a full man-month trying to understand libwww, writing a function of intermediate complexity (supporting post requests, xml parsing, authentication etc.) and figuring out that the problems I encountered were due to libwww and not my code. I switched to libcurl, rewrote the same code in a week and haven't looked back. Perhaps this library has some features that libcurl doesn't, though I didn't have to use them for my needs. However, for libwww to survive, someone has to focus on these features and let libcurl do the rest. Personally, I can't find any reason to suggest libwww to anyone. Christopher Akritides Hellas On Line, GreeceReceived on Friday, 26 November 2004 15:05:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:18:44 GMT