W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-lib@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: xmlparse.dll included in libwww distribution

From: Vladimir Kozlov <Vladimir.Kozlov@idm.ru>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:32:13 +0300
Message-ID: <6174667DA154D211BA2D00A0C9292CCB06DD11@E0-IDM.r.miee.ru>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, www-lib@w3.org, Jose.Kahan@W3.Org (όΜ. ΠΟήΤΑ) <jose.kahan@w3.org>
As far as I remember, I've sent the xml*.dll files compiled without
debug information to Jose. (By the way, precompiled version of libwww
now includes these files)
If not, I could send it without any problem. Jose, could you please
commit them?

Kind regards,

Vladimir. 
--------------------------
Vladimir Kozlov, IDM, Ltd.

e-mail     : mailto:Vladimir.Kozlov@idm.ru
PGP Key ID : 0x5360FA9B
Phone      : +7 (095) 534-4221
Fax        : +7 (095) 530-2275
www        : http://www.idm.ru


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 9:17 PM
> To: www-lib@w3.org
> Subject: RE: xmlparse.dll included in libwww distribution
> 
> 
> 
> I think there is a stripped version of that dll somewhere, 
> no? Otherwise, it
> should be relatively easy to recompile it without debug information.
> 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
> http://magnet
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel DeYoung [mailto:joel@deyoung.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 08:05
> To: jjc@clark.com
> Cc: frystyk@w3.org
> Subject: xmlparse.dll included in libwww distribution
> 
> 
> I downloaded and built under Win32 version 5.2.8 of the libwww
> distribution, which includes the expat xml package.  I link with the
> provided import libraries (xmlparse.lib & xmltok.lib) and use 
> the provided
> Win32 DLLs (xmlparse.dll & xmltok.dll).
> 
> I am having a problem in that the provided xmlparse.dll is 
> dependent on
> msvcrtd.dll, the debug version of the C run-time library.  
> When I give my
> application to someone who doesn't have MSVC installed, they of course
> don't have this DLL and my app won't load because of this implicit
> dependency.  Shouldn't you be providing an xmlparse.dll that 
> is dependent
> on msvcrt.dll, the release version of the run-time library?  
> This DLL is on
> every Windows machine.  I would really rather not have to distribute a
> debug version of the C run-time library with my app.
> 
> Please advise.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Joel DeYoung
> joel@deyoung.net
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------
> Joel DeYoung
> Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
> joel@deyoung.net
> http://joel.deyoung.net
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 14 January 2000 01:33:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:18:35 GMT