W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-lib@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: Some facts and questions about libwww-ssl

From: Desrochers, Gary <Gary.Desrochers@fmr.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:48:29 -0400
Message-ID: <706274F62639D411A69200508BCF03AC21D886@MSGMMK577NTS.fmr.com>
To: "'jose.kahan@w3.org'" <jose.kahan@w3.org>
Cc: www-lib@w3.org
I think I have a couple more bug fix/memory leak patches that I would like
to submit and I will try to get them out next week.

-----Original Message-----
From: jose.kahan@w3.org [mailto:jose.kahan@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 6:44 AM
To: jose.kahan@w3.org
Cc: www-lib@w3.org
Subject: Re: Some facts and questions about libwww-ssl

In our previous episode, jose.kahan@w3.org said:
> The things I don't know:
> - were libwww and libwww-ssl always distributed separately?
> - are there some test programs somewhere,  which I have missed?
> I think I'll keep both zones separate. Of course, the process can be
> but at least we'll get a first version out.

I finally found out the answer to my own two questions.

The libwww-ssl code was originally found under Library/src/SSL and there
was a test program called wwwssl in that directory.

Yesterday, I merged back the SSL code into libwww and changed the configure
and Makefile as needed and put the example under Library/Examples. It
and works out nicely.

I'm testing some final details. If I don't find anything unusual, I'll
commit the code to CVS and make a distribution tar file, so that people
can help testing it.

I propose to call this distribution 5.2.10b (unless someone has a better
name). I'll continue adding patches next week and will update the changelog.

Any comments? :)

Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 07:48:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:33:52 UTC