- From: Maria ANGI/HCM/97S <e_mangi@utila.ifi.uni-klu.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 19:21:45 +0200
- To: www-jigsaw@w3.org
> Maria ANGI writes: > > Hi! > > > > > > I have subclassed the HttpManager class. > > Now I have problems with the w3c.www.protocol.http.Request and Reply classes. > > It would be fine if they could have at least a protected constructor. > > > > I was rethinking about your query. I would be really interested to > know (if possible) what kind of extensions you are writting, in > particular couldn't that be done with filters ? > > Anselm. > What I am doing is implementing a caching hierarchy. It is not based on the ICP protocol. So for example, I need to send a "HEAD" request to query the upper cache for some informations and depending on these informations to send "GET" request. I've wanted to use the HttpServer.runRequest(Request) method more times. If I would implement this through a filter it would be more complecated and again I would need to instantiate a Request object(which is impossible now because it hasn't accessable constructor). Of course I could make my own "myRequest" class with the same implementation like Request and using it to emit requests. But it's not fine. Angi Maria
Received on Thursday, 29 May 1997 13:20:57 UTC