W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-jigsaw@w3.org > January to February 2003

Re: Why GNUJSP with Jigsaw - dispute

From: Zahid Rahman <zahidr@btconnect.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:16:42 -0000
Message-ID: <003001c2c220$e5452090$026723d9@objectwoszbz07>
To: <www-jigsaw@w3.org>

I was looking for some J2EE  and Java Architecures to 
evaluate  and IBM sent their suite of tools.

One consultant wrote that IBM are not
J2EE compliant and IBM only supports version1.0.

Another consultant wrote there was a dispute
over the specification implying that it should
not be considered a mistake that IBM only 
supports v1.0 but there is a disagreement based 
on technical issues.

Regards,
Zahid 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Marquis" <marquis@roble.com>
To: <www-jigsaw@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: Why GNUJSP with Jigsaw


> 
> Zahid Rahman wrote:
> >Why GNUJSP ?
> >GNUJSP runs in the same JVM as Jigsaw furthermore it is part of the
> >Component model architecure which is the philosophy behind J2EE.
> 
> After seriously evaluating GNUJSP for a project we tentatively
> decided to use Tomcat instead due to 3 issues:
> 
> * It does not support JSP v1.2 or v2.0,
> 
> * It does not appear to support taglibs, and
> 
> * It implements no security features instead relying on the
>   webserver.
> 
> If this list is correct:
> 
> * Is anyone working on these issues?
> 
> * Are there other JSP servlets worth looking at?
> 
> TIA,
> -- 
> Roger Marquis
> Roble Systems Consulting
> http://www.roble.com/
> 
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 09:17:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 April 2012 12:13:36 GMT