W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-jigsaw@w3.org > September to October 1996

Re: Jigsaw as a proxy-serve/service!

From: Anselm Baird_Smith <abaird@www43.inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 10:36:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199610230836.KAA07960@www43.inria.fr>
To: mjoshi@kset.com
Cc: wplatzer <wplatzer@iaik.tu-graz.ac.at>, Jigsaw Mailing List <www-jigsaw@w3.org>
Mahesh Joshi writes:
 > Hi,
 > I am running Jigsaw as a proxy server on NT 4.0 and it works
 > great except I cant access a few sites which complain about =
 > "bad protocol". (eg. http://www.cricket.org).

I just checked that site it uses:
Server: Mathopd/1.1b1

Don't forget that Jigsa wproxy is fullly http/1.1 compliant. I tried
to be as smart as possible with broken servers, but this one is out of

 > Also, how does one control how long a document should stay in the
 > cache? =

There is not much control available right now, more will be provided
when the caching algorithms become smarte (consider the current algo
as being level 0 of what could/should be done, ie its compliant and

 > There are certain sites like my.yahoo.com which change every 5 mins
 > which proxy servers and Web browsers should not cache. Netscape =
 > handles such sites correctly i.e. will always retreive a new
 > copy when requested. But Internet Explorer and Jigsaw always return
 > a cached version of the document.  I am not a Web expert, could
 > someone explain why this happens?

Itis up to webadmins to setup their site properly. A proxy cannot hard
code rules such as "my.yahoo.com" pages should always be
refreshed. There are a number of doing so. Jigsaw default
configuration, for example, states that all HTML pages are cacheable
for two days, you can change this globally (at the extension level),
or on a per document basis (check the max-age attribute of the

 > Also, under what IDEs are recommended/have worked with compiling
 > Jigsaw natively on NT 4.0/related platforms? =

Symantec runs it fine (and speed it up), that's the only com,piler
that I have checked. kaffe is the next one to test on my list.

Received on Wednesday, 23 October 1996 04:37:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:30 UTC