W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-jigsaw@w3.org > November to December 1996

Re: Java NET.DLL implementation

From: Scott Jewell <jewellsc@pop.mts.kpnw.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 13:17:13 -0800
To: Remo Tabanelli <remo@design.cds.tizeta.it>
Cc: ssl-users@mincom.oz.au, www-jigsaw@w3.org
Message-id: <32A73BD8.7872@pop.mts.kpnw.org>
Remo Tabanelli wrote:
> 
> where are (will be) this stuffs?
> remo.
> 
> On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, Anselm Baird_Smith wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Next release of Jigsaw will include exactly the right hook for SSL
> > inclusion (which I use for HTTP-NG testing, in fact). I guess that
> > with this hook in place, SSL support in Jigsaw should not take longer
> > then - say - two days (well, four :-)
> >
> > Anselm.
> >
> > Scott Jewell writes:
> >  > Hi,
> >  >
> >  > I've recently completed some work on replacing the sockets routines
> >  > within the NET.DLL supplied with Java with routines utilizing SSLeay.  I
> >  > thought I'd see if there was any interest in making the routines
> >  > available under the SSLapps umbrella.  These routines allow any Java
> >  > program to communicate using SSL without modification.
> >  > ....
> >  > Scott Jewell
> >  > jewellsc@pop.mts.kpnw.org
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> 
>         ============================================================
>                 Remo Tabanelli C.D.S. (Computec Data System)
>                 Bologna Via Marconi 20 phone ++39-51-279849
>                 e-mail remo@cds.tizeta.it http://www.cds.tizeta.it
>         ============================================================
Hi Remo,

They haven't found a home yet.  I've just recently completed the work. 
My first thought was maybe SSLapps.  I'm not sure if the quality is up
to their standards or not however.  I'm just now starting to see if it
holds together in real world situations.  If they do find a home, I'll
be sure to let the mailing list know.  
-- 
The opinions and actions mentioned are my own and nobody else.
Received on Thursday, 5 December 1996 18:53:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 April 2012 12:13:25 GMT