W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-jigsaw@w3.org > May to June 1996

Re: FAQ, Walkthroughs and requests.

From: Anselm Baird-Smith <abaird@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 1996 18:45:08 +0500
Message-Id: <9606152245.AA26678@www18.w3.org>
To: alex@access.com.au (Alexandre Rafalovitch)
Cc: www-jigsaw@w3.org
 > 
 > You see a page. It has several proposal in a form (It would be good to have
 > Jigsaw do Bla) or (It would be create if somebody created
 > Filter/Resource/Bla to do Bla).
 > There is a link next to the description that leads to more complete
 > description with examples, if author of proposal has any. Also there is
 > count of how many people voted for it/against it.
 > There is a way to add a vote for/against and maybe area for comments on why
 > for/against. If there is a large number of 'for' votes on some particular
 > request, somebody might start discussing how to implement it or would it
 > require redesign, decrease performance and some such.

This seems to look like the 'project' page I wanted to put up
(although it is much more elaborated). The other thing that I would
like to point out is that Jigsaw is currently in alpha status, and I
would really like to turn it in into beta by the end of the year (or
perhaps even before). To do this means that we commit to Jigsaw's API
and file formats. 
I know that both of them needs some work in some areas, and I would be
really glad to here from people extending Jigsaw.

 > After a while there would be a nice list of things to do and interesting
 > introduction to power of Jigsaw for beginers. I would like to do such thing
 > myself, but I do not have exposable web space (I am behind the firewall).
 > If somebody could borrow me some space on Jigsaw server, I could design
 > such form on my local machine and then copy it across to visible machine.
 > 
 > Does anybody think my idea is any good or it would never work as expected ?

This seems to me like a good idea. I think (also I ll have to check
before commiting) that we could aford the requested space, could we
continue this off-line Alex ?

Anselm.
Received on Saturday, 15 June 1996 18:45:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 April 2012 12:13:24 GMT