If Dave is right about the implications of the proposed new functionality, then I would like to add my endorsement. We need to do similar things to what he is interested in. -Mark Dave Makower wrote: > > Anselm Baird-Smith wrote: > >I would really like to introduce the possibility for a directory > >resource to have its own resource indexer (so that you could say that > >everything below this directory should be exported in that way), how > >valuable this would be to you (it's really a matter of priority of > >tasks) ? > > > > In response to a previous question of mine, you replied that I ought to be > subclassing DirectoryResource rather than building it from scratch by > subclassing FilteredResource. One reason I had to fall back to > FilteredResource is that I wanted to be able to let a subtree use its own > indexing strategy (perhaps creating indices of information that doesn't > actually live in the file system per se, but is instead accessed through > other channels). Sounds like this new functionality you describe would > help me out quite a bit.Received on Friday, 9 August 1996 14:13:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:46 GMT