RE: [Encoding] Status of bug 26154 [I18N-ACTION-338]

I'll take that as a "deferred" then. Thanks,

Addison

> -----Original Message-----
> From: annevankesteren@gmail.com [mailto:annevankesteren@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 10:04 AM
> To: Phillips, Addison
> Cc: www-international@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [Encoding] Status of bug 26154 [I18N-ACTION-338]
> 
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
> wrote:
> > Can you clarify:
> >
> > (1) if you think this item is deferrable for the future/should be
> > deferred
> > (2) if not deferred/deferrable, when you might be able to address it
> 
> It's something that implementations will align on as soon as IDL provides
> support. I don't know when that will be. The API is not broken without it though.
> 
> 
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Sunday, 31 August 2014 18:13:41 UTC