- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:31:28 +0100
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2014/07/31-i18n-minutes.html
Text version follows:
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
31 Jul 2014
[2]Agenda
[2]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014Jul/0032.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2014/07/31-i18n-irc
Attendees
Present
Addison, Richard, JcK, Koji, Mati
Regrets
felix, david
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
Addison Phillips
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Agenda
2. [6]Action Items
3. [7]Info Share
4. [8]RADAR
5. [9]CSS Text: review items for closure
6. [10]Encoding LC
7. [11]TimeZones in HTML
8. [12]AOB?
* [13]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
Agenda
Action Items
[14]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
[14] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
action-319?
<trackbot> action-319 -- Koji Ishii to Report back on korean
justification when response received -- due 2014-07-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[15]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/319
[15] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/319
koji: two issues to resolve
... one when language is korean
... one when unspecified
... sent proposal to style and public-cjk for former case
(korean known)
close action-319
<trackbot> Closed action-319.
<koji> For Korean justification, here's the proposal
[16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0513.
html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0513.html
action-323?
<trackbot> action-323 -- Richard Ishida to Modify instrucitons
for reviews to include the new markings -- due 2014-07-31 --
OPEN
<trackbot>
[17]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/323
[17] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/323
close action-323
<trackbot> Closed action-323.
close action-324
<trackbot> Closed action-324.
close action-325
<trackbot> Closed action-325.
Info Share
JcK: precis met at ietf last week
... two outstanding issues
... which I own
... one is: notion that per-protocol profiles is dangerous
... other is: how does ietf community review changes to new
versions of unicode
... since ietf and utc look at certain things differently
... compromise would be to ignore first issue
... second would get sorted inside ietf
... charmod differences with precis
... are off table
... unless raised
... write to pete resnick and ask where to say something
<koji> [18]http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2014/14176.htm
[18] http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2014/14176.htm
koji: there will be utc next week
... agenda above
... utr50 will be reviewed
... also a few other cjk topics
... bopomofo letter i
richard: participating in geek week
... one activity is updating uniview
... so supports unicode 7 final release
... one or two enhacements
<r12a> [19]http://rishida.net/uniview/
[19] http://rishida.net/uniview/
richard: look in next day or so
RADAR
[20]https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Review_radar
[20] https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Review_radar
CSS Text: review items for closure
[21]https://www.w3.org/International/track/products/2
[21] https://www.w3.org/International/track/products/2
[22]https://www.w3.org/International/track/products/2
[23]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014J
ul/0023.html
[22] https://www.w3.org/International/track/products/2
[23]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014Jul/0023.html
issue-337?
<trackbot> issue-337 -- line terminator handling ⓒ -- open
<trackbot> [24]http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/337
[24] http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/337
JcK: did send a comment to list
... think they are doing wrong thing, but think it is
"okay"/clear
richard: can close, put comment on record
assign action-315 to richard
Encoding LC
koji: what does "t" mean?
richard: haven't raised or submitted, it stands for "track"
[25]http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/25
[25] http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/25
[26]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014J
ul/0028.html
[26]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014Jul/0028.html
[27]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014J
ul/0027.html
[27]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014Jul/0027.html
The IANA Character Sets registry also tracks character
encodings and their specifications (if any), as well as
assigning labels to registered character encodings. This
specification, rather than the IANA Character Sets registry, is
the recommended normative reference for specifications that
define Web protocols and document formats and their
implementations. Implementers should be aware that other,
non-Web, protocols and formats (such as, for example, ema[CUT]
The IANA Character Sets registry also tracks character
encodings and their specifications (if any), as well as
assigning labels to registered character encodings. This
specification, rather than the IANA Character Sets registry, is
the recommended normative reference for specifications that
define Web protocols and document formats and their
implementations.
[28]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014J
ul/0018.html
[28]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014Jul/0018.html
addison: conformance rather than normative?
jck: formats/protocols for new-ish and web-ish type formats
... are different than that ietf-ish type stuff, so different
rules
This specification has requirements that are distinct from and
incompatible with ICSR.
jck: partly incompatible with
richard: carrot to use this spec?
<scribe> ACTION: addison: invite anne to next teleconference to
discuss open encoding issues [recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2014/07/31-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-326 - Invite anne to next
teleconference to discuss open encoding issues [on Addison
Phillips - due 2014-08-07].
TimeZones in HTML
[30]https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/HTML5TimeZone
[30] https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/HTML5TimeZone
richard: con for proposal A still mentions <date>
... proposal B says microsyntaxes rather than iso8601
<scribe> ACTION: addison: update the time zone proposal and
then file an issue against html5.next about it [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2014/07/31-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-327 - Update the time zone proposal
and then file an issue against html5.next about it [on Addison
Phillips - due 2014-08-07].
AOB?
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: addison: invite anne to next teleconference to
discuss open encoding issues [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2014/07/31-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: addison: update the time zone proposal and then
file an issue against html5.next about it [recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2014/07/31-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 13:31:56 UTC