- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:10:58 -0800
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > I was making the necessary changes to my tests and the Predefined Counter > Styles WD when it occurred to me that we are making a mistake here to make > the 'longer-hebrew' style described below an alternative. > > Firefox, Chrome, Safari and Opera all implement hebrew numbering already per > the longer-hebrew style. IE and old-Opera don't implement hebrew numbering > at all. > > Run the test here: > http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/run?manifest=predefined-counter-styles&test=list-style-type-116a > > See the results here: > http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/predefined-counter-styles/results/results-predefined-counter-styles#hebrew > > So why not make the definition of hebrew in the spec be the definition > provided for longer-hebrew below, and possibly keep the other hanging around > as the alternative? > > If we don't, I doubt that hebrew will get through CR. If we do, it will sail > through, and if people really want the verbose version that only goes up to > 2000, they can use a definition in the Predefined Counter Styles doc (though > I'm not sure what I'd call it). The implementation information is convincing. I've switched the spec's definition of "hebrew" over to the longer form, and updated DoC issue #1 from Rejected to Accepted. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 23:11:53 UTC