- From: Najib Tounsi <ntounsi@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:27:45 +0100
- To: Matitiahu Allouche <matitiahu.allouche@gmail.com>, www-international@w3.org
On 6/19/14 2:51 PM, Matitiahu Allouche wrote: > > 11) In 2.2 table of Compatibility Equivalence, the third example is > labelled "Cursive forms". I think that this would be better labelled > "character shapes". Rationale: the example shows various shapes of an > Arabic letter. But similar examples could be taken from final versus > non-final shapes of some Hebrew letters, or from the final versus > non-final shapes of the Greek sigma letter. Hebrew and Greek are not > cursive scripts, so the issue here is having position-dependent > shapes, not cursiveness. > Cursiveness may illustrate well the change in the shape according to the position. Regards, Najib > To avoid mixing the 2 issues, I suggest to label this line "Character > shapes" (or something equivalent) and to take as examples letters from > Hebrew or from Greek. > > *--* > > *Shalom (Regards), Mati* >
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 18:20:28 UTC