- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:54:52 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: www International <www-international@w3.org>
The i18n WG is satisfied with this resolution and has closed this issue. Thanks! RI On 09/05/2014 00:45, fantasai wrote: > On 01/24/2014 10:21 AM, Phillips, Addison wrote: >> State: >> OPEN WG Comment >> Product: >> CSS3-text >> Raised by: >> Richard Ishida >> Opened on: >> 2013-12-11 >> Description: >> 5.2. Breaking Rules for Punctuation: the ‘line-break’ property >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-text-3-20131010/#line-break-property >> >> "The rules here are following guidelines from KLREQ for Korean, >> which don't allow the Chinese/Japanese-specific breaks. However, >> the resulting behavior could use some review and feedback to make >> sure they are correct, particularly when “word basis” breaking is >> used (‘word-break: keep-all’) in Korean." >> >> I don't see what this is referring to. The rules below seem to all >> be relevant to either Japanese or Chinese. > > Right. The question is whether Korean should have the same allowances > as Chinese and Japanese. Notice there are special line breaks that are > allowed *only* when the language is *known* to be Chinese or Japanese. > We could allow them also if the language is known to be Korean. However, > KLREQ does not seem to allow these breaks, so we did not allow these > special breaks for Korean. > > In general, we need closer review of line-breaking for Korean, since we > have received very few comments on Korean line-breaking rules. > > ~fantasai > >
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 16:55:26 UTC