- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 06:51:58 +0000
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
>>>> * “auto” automagically does the best justification for the content >>>> language >>> >>> Is there any room for disagreement about "the best"? The great bulk >>> of printed English text is justified, but many people prefer ragged right. >> >> Yes. And it depends on the situation. On the Web, ragged right is so popular as >> to be close to "the best", even if that's just a result of >> (former?) browser technology limitations. >> > > Sure, but presumably "auto" would not be a synonym for "none"... That’s not a problem here because this discussion is about text-justify:auto, which has no effect unless the author sets text-align:justify. Authors can choose ragged right by text-align:start. To make this visual tree: text-align:start —> ragged right text-align:justify text-justify:auto —> automagically does the best justification for the content language text-justify:<other values> —> specific justification behavior /koji
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 06:52:30 UTC