W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > July to September 2013

[Bug 20089] Meaning of raw UTF-16LE/BE

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:59:12 +0000
To: www-international@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20089-4285-BZNGFX4DNt@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
           Assignee|dave.null@w3.org            |silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> ---
Would it be better to replace the reference on this sentence with an [ENCODING]
reference and just point to UTF-16LE and UTF-16BE? Something like this:

"The term a UTF-16 encoding refers to any variant of UTF-16: UTF-16LE or
UTF-16BE with or without BOM. [ENCODING]"

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You reported the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 00:59:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:35 UTC