W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [text-decor-3] Emphasis marks and ruby

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:59:24 -0800
Message-ID: <5136E94C.9010605@inkedblade.net>
To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>
On 02/03/2013 09:33 AM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote:
> fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote on 2013/02/03 5:54:29
>>
>> OK. So, there are several things we could do with the spec, which of these do
>> you recommend?
>>
>> Question 1:
>>
>>     Should we remove allowing to hide ruby when emphasis marks are present?
>>     a) yes
>>     b) no
>
> a) yes.
>
> The ruby text is a part of the document content and the emphasis marks
> are a style. Dropping content text is worse than dropping styles.
>
>>
>> Question 2:
>>
>>     What should the spec say wrt emphasis mark position when ruby is present?
>>
>>     a) Require placing emphasis marks as close as possible to base text
>>        (Antenna House default behavior)
>>    [...]
>
> a)
>
> There are both cases, but a) is simpler and if we leave this undefined,
> we lose interoperability.

Thanks for your feedback, Murakami-san! We updated the spec to require
the behavior in AH.
   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-emphasis-position-property

We also added examples showing how emphasis marks or ruby can be hidden
when they conflict using additional style rules, if that is what the
author wants.

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 06:59:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 March 2013 06:59:55 GMT