W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [text-decor-3] Emphasis marks and ruby

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:59:24 -0800
Message-ID: <5136E94C.9010605@inkedblade.net>
To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>
On 02/03/2013 09:33 AM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote:
> fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote on 2013/02/03 5:54:29
>> OK. So, there are several things we could do with the spec, which of these do
>> you recommend?
>> Question 1:
>>     Should we remove allowing to hide ruby when emphasis marks are present?
>>     a) yes
>>     b) no
> a) yes.
> The ruby text is a part of the document content and the emphasis marks
> are a style. Dropping content text is worse than dropping styles.
>> Question 2:
>>     What should the spec say wrt emphasis mark position when ruby is present?
>>     a) Require placing emphasis marks as close as possible to base text
>>        (Antenna House default behavior)
>>    [...]
> a)
> There are both cases, but a) is simpler and if we leave this undefined,
> we lose interoperability.

Thanks for your feedback, Murakami-san! We updated the spec to require
the behavior in AH.

We also added examples showing how emphasis marks or ruby can be hidden
when they conflict using additional style rules, if that is what the
author wants.

Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 06:59:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:04:32 UTC