W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Ruby extension: empty ruby text

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:36:28 +0000
Message-ID: <512B930C.8040209@w3.org>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, Ishii Koji <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
On 25/02/2013 15:31, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On 22/02/2013 03:12 , fantasai wrote:
>> On 02/15/2013 11:52 AM, Richard Ishida wrote:
>>> http://rishida.net/misc/ruby/ruby-authoring.html ...
>> These are very interesting examples! I have a couple questions on them.
>> In the example with 振り仮名...
>>    - In the markup with an empty <rt>, it would render correctly, but
>>      the accessibility story would be broken because you would replace
>>      り with nothing if you were replacing the bases with their <rt>s.
> Would it break if the accessibility algorithm were: "replace the base
> with the annotation UNLESS the annotation is empty"? It's not hard to
> specify.

Not sure whether you were asking me or Fantasai, but it sounds good to me.

One thing I haven't yet asked, but keep meaning to, is whether we expect 
people to regularly sandwich hiragana/katakana in ruby elements for 
simplicity. Imagine, for example, a sentence composed of (K)anji and 
(h)iragana as follows, where the last three h's are the gramatical 
ending of a verb:


would we require people to do


or would it be ok to save a lot of typing and do


which could be marked up as follows where B=ruby base, a=ruby text, 
h=hiragana and <space>=empty rt:

<ruby>BBaaBBaah BBaah Kahhh </ruby>

Its very tempting to do that, especially for a long text that needs 
rubification by hand.


Richard Ishida
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 16:37:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:34 UTC