W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:42:17 +0100
To: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
Message-id: <20121220164217253983.146503ad@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Asmus Freytag, Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:25:49 -0800:
> On 12/20/2012 3:53 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> How about being consistent about writing
>> 
>> 	byte order mark
>> 
>> and not
>> 
>> 	byte-order mark
>> 
>> since the former is the official form?
> 
> And not to forget,  BYTE ORDER MARK, when indicating the formal identifier.

So then, let me rephrase my proposal: How about using the formal 
identifier rather than 'byte-order mark'?

PS: I personally like the hyphened version. So this proposal is only 
based on a wish to promote the official codification.
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2012 15:42:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 December 2012 15:42:41 GMT