W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: For review: 1 new and 3 updated articles about language declarations in HTML

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 23:24:12 +0200
To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110909232412291118.d799b1d0@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Leif Halvard Silli, Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:15:02 +0200:
> Asmus Freytag, Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:09:30 -0700:
>> On 9/9/2011 3:12 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>>> Richard Ishida, Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:49:39 +0100:
> 
>>>> Question: For HTML, should we use language declarations in HTTP
>>>> headers and meta elements, and how are they different from those in
>>>> language attributes?
>>> Definitely better. How about replacing 'use' with 'have'?
>>> 
>>> AFTERTHOUGHT: or perhaps replace 'use' with 'have any' ?
>> 
>> Keep the use.
> 
> If so, how about the following "use-age":

	Updated "use-age":

Question: For HTML, should we use THE language declarations OF HTTP
and THE meta ELEMENT, and how are they different from THAT OF THE
language attributes?
-- 
Leif H Silli
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 21:24:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 September 2011 21:24:50 GMT