W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2011

(unknown charset) Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-88 content-language-multiple

From: (unknown charset) Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 18:02:00 +0100
To: (unknown charset) Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: (unknown charset) HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110319180200753772.eb4a40ba@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Sam Ruby, Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:03 -0400:
> On 03/19/2011 12:19 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Options which could make the situation simpler:
> If you have new information to present, please consider taking the 
> steps which are described here:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11447#c3

Since we took the poll, diminishing the difference between XML and 
HTML5 has gotten higher on my priority list. And, this decision *does* 
take a step in that direction. Given that we have taken that step, we 
should perhaps go the line out.

Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me that a change to the 
language determination algorithm would be another issue than the 
particular conformance requirement that we now have decided upon. 
Likewise, making html@lang obligatory would also be another issue, it 
seems. (I guess, if included in the change proposals that we voted on, 
then such options *could* have been part of the ISSUE-88, but in fact, 
they weren't.)
leif halvard silli
Received on Saturday, 19 March 2011 17:02:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:32 UTC