- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:16:58 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- Cc: www-international@w3.org
John Cowan, Sun, 29 May 2011 16:05:09 -0400: > Koji Ishii scripsit: > >> However, I'm against applying NFC to displayable contents. If you >> read XML 1.0 5th Edition carefully, it suggests using NFC only for >> XML Names[1]. > > Actually, it suggests not using compatibility characters. It's neutral > about precomposed (NFC) vs. decomposed (NFD). Well, it doesn't sound neutral when XML 1.0 says: ]] 3. Characters in names should be expressed using Normalization Form C as defined in [UnicodeNormal]. [[ The [UnicodeNormal] reference leads to 'Unicode normalization forms' [1]. However it appears a bit circular when it claims that "other W3C Specifications (such as XML 1.0 5th Edition) recommend using Normalization Form C for all content". (XML 1.0 points to the report and the report points to XML 1.0.) And it doesn't seem that XML 1.0 specifically recommends NFC "for all content". [1] http://unicode.org/reports/tr15/ -- Leif Halvard Silli
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2011 20:17:30 UTC