W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2010

RE: For review: Character encodings in HTML and CSS

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:02:04 +0100
To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: 'CE Whitehead' <cewcathar@hotmail.com>, www-international@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100216180204769568.18f3f1e5@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Richard Ishida, Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:12:08 -0000:
> Beware of relying solely on examples for learning ;-) 

So you will add text to your example, to make the point that authors 
may use it both with and without a dot? ;-)

> A little further down
> the text at each of the links you point to, you'll see "The extension
> argument is case-insensitive, and can be specified with or without a leading
> dot."

Examples were the dot is used is what users/authors will actually 
encounter in Apache config files and thus seems more pedagogical.

In fact, I pointed to the Apache documentation not because I had read 
it (recently), but because it was simpler than pointing to the copy of 
"httpd-languages.conf" on my hard disk ... 
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 17:02:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:31 UTC