W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ISSUE-88 - Change proposal (new update)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 13:05:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4BE3F3FB.8000603@gmx.de>
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, www-international@w3.org
On 07.05.2010 11:34, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> On 2010-05-05 20:22, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Let multiple language tags continue to be legal.
>> (http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ContentLanguages)
>
> This is a response to the arguments put forth in both that change
> proposal, the the change proposal from the i18n WG. Both proposals
> present similarly flawed arguments, and so I will refute them together.
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Htmlissue88
>
> For this issue, we have 3 options presented:
>
> 1. Make Content-Language non-conforming.
> 2. Leave Content-Language as Obsolete but Conforming, permitting only a
> single language tag. (Current spec)
> 3. Leave Content-Language as Obsolete but Conforming, permitting a comma
> separated list of language tags.
> ...

Another alternative is to leave it alone (it's conformant in HTML4, 
isn't it?).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 7 May 2010 11:06:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 May 2010 11:06:15 GMT