W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: quick question on I18N

From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:49:46 +0900
Message-ID: <4A26473A.7080003@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
CC: www-international@w3.org
Hello Shadi,

For you, these questions look like quick questions because you are very 
familiar with EARL. However, nobody here is familiar, so it's not easy 
at all for us to answer them.

Regards,    Martin.

On 2009/06/02 20:22, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
> Dear I18N group,
>
> ERT WG is hopefully putting together a Last Call for EARL 1.0 and were
> going through the Requirements [1] again. We have this requirement:
>
> * D07 - EARL 1.0 will provide vocabularies that support the
> internationalization infrastructure included in [RDF].
>
> We also have a more generic requirement to support the QA framework:
>
> * D02 - The specifications and technical notes that comprise EARL 1.0
> will be developed and published according to the [W3C QA Framework].
>
>
> Question: is there anything more we need to do to ensure that we are
> requiring ourselves to support I18N to the highest extent possible?
> Basically we see no issues with any of the vocabularies that we are
> defining by EARL, so we should get everything for free through RDF.
> However, we do want to have a requirement that forces us to do the
> adequate level of due-diligence checking.
>
> [1] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Requirements-20090526>
>
> Thanks,
> Shadi
>

-- 
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 09:51:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 June 2009 09:51:18 GMT