On 2 Jun 2009, at 17:17, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > The question is how to actually bring this into the draft. It has to > be more than a half hearted recommendation. It should be more in the > direction of how utf-8/-16 is the default for XML - a conformance > requirement. One possibility would be to just say something like, "conforming documents MUST be encoded as UTF-8 and declare themselves to be so". The biggest problem I see with that is that from an RFC 2119 point of view using UTF-8 isn't required for interoperability (for a start, UAs are required to support Windows-1252 as well). -- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/>Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 17:28:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:19 GMT