- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:58:07 +0100
- To: <www-international@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
For clarity I added information about Uniscribe versions, added another test using an older version of Uniscribe, and rewrote the summary to highlight the potential effect of the underlying operating system support. RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Richard Ishida > Sent: 23 September 2008 13:02 > To: www-international@w3.org > Cc: www-style@w3.org > Subject: New tests: Web fonts > > > Tests: > .TTF font linking test http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-webfonts-1 > .EOT fonts test http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-webfonts-2 > > Results: > .TTF font linking test http://www.w3.org/International/tests/results/results- > webfonts-linking > .EOT fonts test http://www.w3.org/International/tests/results/results-webfonts- > eot > > These tests explore how and if a user agent supports download of font information > over the Web, particularly for complex script support. Fonts are downloaded both > as directly as OpenType fonts, and using an EOT wrapper. Both methods tested > use the CSS @font-face mechanism. > > > > ============ > Richard Ishida > Internationalization Lead > W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) > > http://www.w3.org/International/ > http://rishida.net/ > > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 14:57:52 UTC