W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: Chinese language and emphasis

From: <shen@cse.ust.hk>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:38:35 +0800 (HKT)
Message-ID: <4844.218.250.188.30.1201700315.squirrel@imail.cse.ust.hk>
To: "Swan, Henny" <Henny.Swan@rnib.org.uk>
Cc: www-international@w3.org, ishida@w3.org

> Hi All,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone could answer a couple of questions for me. As I
> understand it Japanese doesn't use italics as a form of emphasis, so
> using <i> tags around ideographic text is a big no no. Can anyone
> clarify if other languages, specifically Chinese, fall into this
> category? If Chinese does how is emphasis indicated visually on a web
> page, would it be with a dot above the character?

Although it is possible to use italics on Chinese characters, it
is seldom done on documents or webpages. They look awful. Chinese
webpages often use color, size, bold, or even different fonts for
emphasis.

-Vincent
>
> Many thanks, Henny
>
>
>
>
> --
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
> confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended
> recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
> content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
> sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
> and any attachments from your system.
>
> RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
> its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it
> cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
> We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
>
> Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
> any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
> those of RNIB.
>
> RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
>
> Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl -
> www.blackspider.com
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2008 13:39:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:16 GMT