W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: [whatwg] Is EBCDIC support needed for not breaking the Web?

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:05:23 +0300
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, whatwg List <whatwg@whatwg.org>, www-international@w3.org, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-Id: <35BA2A92-888F-4CBD-B1C9-57A696CB6C76@iki.fi>
To: Benjamin Smedberg <bsmedberg@mozilla.com>

On Jun 2, 2008, at 04:27, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:

> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
>> Firefox and Opera being able get away with not supporting EBCDIC  
>> flavors suggests that EBCDIC-based encodings cannot be particularly  
>> Web-relevant. Even if saying that browsers MUST NOT support them  
>> might end up being a dead letter, it seems that it would be  
>> feasible to say that browsers SHOULD NOT support them or at least  
>> MUST NOT let a heuristic detector guess EBCDIC (for security  
>> reasons).
>
> Gecko does support UTF-7 and will continue to do so because UTF-7 is  
> still in use as a character set for mail encoding and multi-part  
> MIME documents.

Does/will Gecko support UTF-7 as a possible heuristic detector guess  
on the Web/HTTP side?

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 2 June 2008 07:06:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:17 GMT