W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: For review: Tagging text with no language

From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:52:43 -0700
Message-ID: <30b660a20704111552n7f8eca5cp1640a95c77e8e0ad@mail.gmail.com>
To: "John Cowan" <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: "CE Whitehead" <cewcathar@hotmail.com>, www-international@w3.org, "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>
I agree that "" should be treated as a sensible value, with the same meaning
as "und"; that is, an undetermined / unspecified value.


On 4/11/07, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
> Mark Davis scripsit:
> > Your conclusion from 639-2 I find extremely odd, since "zxx" is ALSO
> > in a column that says "English name of language", so by your logic,
> > "zxx" is also a language, just one with no linguistic content.
> Bah.  I'll go no further with this.  My basic point remains:
> whatever "und" means, "" can't mean "language is unknown", since it's
> equally suitable for non-linguistic content.  XSLT documents don't
> have xml:lang attributes, but if they did, "" would be a sensible value.
> --
> BALIN FUNDINUL          UZBAD KHAZADDUMU        cowan@ccil.org
> BALIN SON OF FUNDIN     LORD OF KHAZAD-DUM      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 22:52:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:13 GMT