Steven Pemberton wrote: > >> [Question 4 (XHTML] >> If XHTML does in fact rely on CSS declarations to cause the appropriate >> display of overridden text, then how does it square the fact that the >> behaviour will change, depending on whether people use CSS2 or CSS2.1 >> enabled implementations? > > Ugh. I'm willing to bet that no CSS2 implementation has implemented the > spec for this, and so the question is moot. Actually, they have, and that's probably why it's written the way it is in CSS2.1. IE and Mozilla both implement bidi-override per CSS2.1; Opera implements it as specified in CSS2. (Konqueror and Safari don't implement it at all.) ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 14:00:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:34:22 GMT