W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:52:45 -0700
Message-ID: <45350A5D.2060307@gmail.com>
To: James Holderness <j4_james@hotmail.com>
CC: atom-syntax@imc.org, www-international@w3.org, public-i18n-geo@w3.org

That's certainly a strong option.

- James

James Holderness wrote:
> 
> If you're going to require a separate namespace for bidi support, maybe
> it's best to use XHTML 1.0 and just toss out the lro and rlo values. I
> know I was originally pushing for those to be included, but now that
> I've seen how inconsistent the bdo support is in browsers I think
> they're probably going to be a waste of time. Nobody is going to get
> them right.
> 
> Regards
> James
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 16:52:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:08 GMT