Hi Chris, Not in that FAQ. (We try to keep these things very focused on answering just the question at hand.) Also, ISO have pledged not to do such a thing for 50 years, I believe, so although this is of interest to spec writers such as ourselves, I haven't so far included it in any of these 'practically oriented' articles. ( I try to give people what they need, but not swamp them with unnecessary detail.) Cheers, RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] > Sent: 22 September 2006 17:50 > To: Addison Phillips > Cc: Richard Ishida; 'Martin Duerst'; www-international@w3.org > Subject: Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter > language codes > > On Friday, September 22, 2006, 6:22:21 PM, Addison wrote: > > >> > >> I will though add something that says that the ISO standards still > >> provide the source material for that registry, and that > the registry > >> maintainers take care of the 2 or 3 letter rule. > >> > > AP> +1 > > AP> I think that approach would be best. > > Is it also worth mentioning what happens to the IETF registry > if ISO remove or reallocate a 2 or 3 letter code? > > > > -- > Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org > Interaction Domain Leader > Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group > W3C Graphics Activity Lead > Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG >Received on Friday, 22 September 2006 17:02:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:34:22 GMT