W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: Bidi Markup vs Unicode control characters

From: Andrew Cunningham <andrewc@vicnet.net.au>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:42:08 +1000
Message-ID: <42F809F0.8070004@vicnet.net.au>
To: Sandra Bostian <sbos@loc.gov>
Cc: www-international@w3.org



Sandra Bostian wrote:

> Thank you all for this discussion, by the way. We are looking at a new project using Arabic and this has been highly helpful in clarifying some of the issues.

 From my perspective at the State Library of Victoria, Australia. 
bidirectionality is more an issue for the ocnent management system being 
used. I try not obly draw a distinction between Markup vs CSS

But also CMS/Framework vs textual content. Most of our textual content 
is databased, and some of it needs to be resued in differnet ways. 
Abstracting bidi issues from the data (where practicable) is useful.

Andrew

-- 
Andrew Cunningham
e-Diversity and Content Infrastructure Solutions
Public Libraries Unit, Vicnet
State Library of Victoria
328 Swanston Street
Melbourne  VIC  3000
Australia

andrewc+AEA-vicnet.net.au

Ph. 3-8664-7430
Fax: 3-9639-2175

http://www.openroad.net.au/
http://www.libraries.vic.gov.au/
http://www.vicnet.net.au/
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 01:42:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:05 GMT